Look at the clock on the video. It was about 13:56:10 when the trooper first passed the ambulance on the highway. He had them pulled over less than two minutes later.
If you watched the video, how can you say there was no patient?
Still remains to be seen as to why the ambulance didn't have it's lights/siren going with a patient inside? Makes no difference what I say, I don't hate the police enough to be on this thread. Have a great day...
It’s funny how people can see the same thing to arrive at opposing conclusions regarding what they saw. This is important when considering an eye witness account in a trial case. Consider the number of convictions which have been reversed using today’s DNA evidence, where the individual was often convicted based on eye witness testimony.
While you and I may most likely draw the same/similar conclusions regarding what we witnessed, there are many folks like this guy/gal (luvs dubya), who doesn’t seem to be able to, with any consistent precision, correctly identify what they saw. There is a good argument in Psychology for pre-conceived notions which affect how we perceive things.
In this case, none of our pre-conceived notions should affect what we see since we can review the data over and over. Yet luvsdubya seeks to blame our perceptions on a pre-dispostion to reject authority. (Hate police) His/her theory is flawed in this case, since we can all review the data again and again. Therefore, we should all be able to conclude the LEO was raving and behaving like a madman.
The fact luvsdubya can’t, or refuses to recognize the LEO’s indecent behavior, speaks volumes regarding his/her own flaws in correctly perceiving, and/or acknowledging the data as presented.