Oh,I know that there *will* be a lawsuit.Some filthy lawyer will read this story and think that he's just won the lottery.What I'm saying is that unless the NYPD had reason to see these guys as "bad apples" there should be no lawsuits against the city *allowed* under law.Suits against the individual cops would be fine,however....as would criminal charges.
The problem with your line of reasoning is that the NYPD didn't see these guys as "bad apples" because they didn't look very hard.
Oh, they will tell you that they have internal investigators and such, but for the most part they simple know not to look very hard for corruption because if they do they will find it.
Having to make big payouts to the very few defendants who can come up with absolute proof of innocence sends a message to the brass that they should look harder for the bad ones.
I agree completely, but that can never happen. The rats are bought and paid for by the scumbag "jackpot justice" lawyer lobby, and the rats would never allow their benefactors to get shut off from taxpayer dollars.
Do you know how much health care money could be saved if the scumbag "jackpot justice" lawyers and their lawsuits were reined in? Astronomical... But again, the rats will never let that happen.
Just remember that in this case the plainiff’s “Filthy lawyer” as you choose to call him...is white as snow compared to the Judges and district attourneys involved here.
When you have a plague infested sewage pit of corrupt lawyers, you have to bring another in from outside to disinfect,