Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

“I remember someone talking about the influence that ‘the Velvet Underground’’s first album had on rock music.”

Yes, we’ve all heard “the album that launched a million bands” stuff. i’ll take that as given. Now, don’t you think Elvis, The Beatles, or any number of more popular groups started more? I do.

Then there are people like James Brown or groups like The Ramones/Sex Pistols or Black Sabbath that were influential enough to start a whole subgenre. So why all the focus on The Velvet Underground? They were a nerd’s band. A band for rock critics. Unlike The Beatles, who were a band for everyone.


30 posted on 06/12/2009 2:06:01 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane
Absolutely I consider the Beatles FAR more influential than the Velvet Underground!

It is just I have a greater appreciation for the influence/direction/effect that the Velvet Underground (and especially the Rolling Stones) had on music than that of the Beatles.

Nothing against the Beatles, grew up listening to them and love them. Saw Paul McCartney in concert at the SuperDome around 1992.

34 posted on 06/12/2009 2:14:19 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson