To: pissant
A 34 year old woman is considered “cougar”?
2 posted on
06/11/2009 9:13:28 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(C-NJ)
To: frogjerk
6 posted on
06/11/2009 9:14:50 AM PDT by
icwhatudo
(For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
To: frogjerk
Yeah, I thought a cougar was by definition over 40.
7 posted on
06/11/2009 9:14:50 AM PDT by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
(Whoever coined the term "foolproof" underestimated the ingenuity and determination of fools.)
To: frogjerk
Heck, I thought they were jail bait!
8 posted on
06/11/2009 9:15:37 AM PDT by
starlifter
(Sapor Amo Pullus)
To: frogjerk
I'm sure if you actually click on the website, you'll find alot more of these instead
11 posted on
06/11/2009 9:15:53 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: frogjerk
A 34 year old woman is considered “cougar”? The listed age is at least ten years out of date. The picture is 20 years out of date.
16 posted on
06/11/2009 9:19:51 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: frogjerk
“A 34 year old woman is considered “cougar”?”
If you are 17, yes.
21 posted on
06/11/2009 9:32:36 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson