Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Who is John Galt?

While you were cherry-picking for quotables that you think buttress your claim to something or other you forgot your silly emoticon gramps...

;>)


2,017 posted on 08/12/2009 7:27:57 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2016 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
While you were cherry-picking for quotables that you think buttress your claim to something or other you forgot your silly emoticon gramps...

;>)

Still no response to documented history, that directly contradicts your idiotic point of view? Typical.

Chew on this:

We there find that, notwithstanding the affirmative grants of general authorities [to the federal government]<, there has been the most pointed care in those cases where it was deemed improper that the like authorities should reside in the States, to insert negative clauses prohibiting the exercise of them by the States. The tenth section of the first article consists altogether of such provisions. This circumstance is a clear indication of the sense of the convention, and furnishes a rule of interpretation out of the body of the act, which justifies the position I have advanced and refutes every hypothesis to the contrary.

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 32

Even Hamilton disagreed with you, RockSmokerr...

;>)

2,018 posted on 08/12/2009 7:43:24 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2017 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson