Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You said: "But shows your claim that the South consumed the majority of all imports to be impossible." As you have been told before, point of landing of imports, point of tariff payment, and point of final consumption are all different variables and are generally not dependent. So, your point, again, is irrelevant.
1,214 posted on 07/07/2009 1:43:38 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies ]


To: PeaRidge
As you have been told before, point of landing of imports, point of tariff payment, and point of final consumption are all different variables and are generally not dependent. So, your point, again, is irrelevant.

And as you have been told before, all that is nonsense. Point of landing and point of tariff payment are the same, and point of consumption should be closely aligned with point of landing. So your statement, once again, is nonsense.

1,219 posted on 07/07/2009 2:47:56 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson