Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: earlJam

Both a cross and a yamulke can both be accomodated as a religious accomodation with no concerns for safety or security. The head scarf, which completely covers everything other than the eyes, is a legitimate safety and security issue. I would think an employee would be similarly restricted from wearing a mask or a hood with sunglasses. This goes hand-in-hand with the Muslim women who want to get their drivers’ license and employee ID photos taken with the burkha on. These are forms of IDENTIFICATION, so it makes absolutely NO SENSE to take the photo unless you can clearly identify the employee.


14 posted on 06/09/2009 4:14:44 AM PDT by RightFighter (Sarah Palin - we love you and can't wait to see you again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: RightFighter

The purpose of a uniform is “uniformity” of employees.

There are lots of examples where Christians have been forced to remove a tiny cross pin, cross necklace or even a Christian chastity ring. (Google “employee told to remove cross”)

So I don’t buy your comparison.


16 posted on 06/09/2009 6:47:00 AM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson