Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I THOUGHT IWAS RETIRED BUT I AM NOW UNEMPLOYED
National Ledger ^ | 5/18/09 | Pete LaTona

Posted on 06/08/2009 6:52:11 AM PDT by PeterL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: qam1
How many Human Resources managers, Directors of Communications or Senior vice presidents for global support services do you think are losing their jobs?

As Digital Equipment Corporation went down the toilet, Bob Palmer appointed 200 new vice-presidents in charge of nothing, who all got platinum parachutes. Palmer made $52 million in the collapse he engineered. It was enough to make a solid capitalist start reading Marx.

41 posted on 06/08/2009 7:32:06 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NCCarrs

“The term Financial Planner is an oxymoron.”

I remember what the financial planners said back in 1987 when I lost a chunk of change in the market: “Oops! Well, you have to be in it for the long term!”

I was trying to get the downpayment for a house and in the end I figure I would have done just as well leaving my money in the bank. Which is where most of it has been ever since.


42 posted on 06/08/2009 7:33:04 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All
My rule of thumb is to not invest in anything long term (and I rarely do that anyway) if my recovery horizon is less than five years. The closer you get to retirement the less you should have in equities.

Investing isn't hard but it involves a lot of attention and IMO by the time you hit retirement you should have precious little in equities and your bond money should be spread around between a lot of companies and of various qualities.

As for investment advisors I'm sure there are some good ones but like any sector there are a lot of average ones. Chances are you can do a better job since you have a vested interest; it's your freaking money.

43 posted on 06/08/2009 7:33:36 AM PDT by Proud_texan (Scare people enough and they'll do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterL

zer0, his buddies, and the congresscritters purposefully destroy the economy, and you blame the CEO’s?

This was a free country, and the compensation for CEO’s was a market-will-bear issue and none of your dang business.

Wait until zer0 tells everyone what they can make. Just see what happens. It isn’t going to work this time either.


44 posted on 06/08/2009 7:33:52 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“Retirement”. The word will soon be relegated to old dictionaries and archived Google searches.

With few exceptions, the masses will work until they break down. Afterwards, they’ll be sent to a recycling center for organ processing. Soylent Green becomes the new cooking craze on Iron Chef.


45 posted on 06/08/2009 7:34:14 AM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PeterL

You say you are a “supporter” of the President.

Does that mean you voted for him? If so, you have no one to blame but yourself.

And what kind of retirement investments did you make anyway that thety are “all gone”. Bad ones, it would seem.

I took a hit myself, but by no means are my assets “gone”. What did you do to yourself?

Too bad, but I guess you need to get a job - any job to start. Move to cheap accomdations. Stop eating out. Economize.


46 posted on 06/08/2009 7:34:24 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

“Do some research instead of buying into the corporations-can-do-no-wrong mantra. “

I didn’t say corporations can’t do no wrong. I’m just saying “corporate oligarchy” grossly overstates the political power of corporations and sounds like Huff Po crazy talk.

I’m assuming that you know what a oligarchy is.


47 posted on 06/08/2009 7:34:28 AM PDT by y6162 (uish..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
But my original point stands - the increase in CEO compensation was way greater than the increase in market capitalization

But CEO compensation didn't cause the crash.

Which is how we get government policies that skin working stiffs, such as the proposed cap-and-trade - a lot of corporations actually like the concept because it will be a barrier to entry for a lot of potential competitors.

Which is why efforts should be to cut the size of government to 1/4th the size or less. Out of control government is the recipe for out of control corporations.

48 posted on 06/08/2009 7:34:56 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant

I do not know where this guy is coming from....wifie and I took a hit ( about 30% ) and have already gained a sizeable portion of that back...the only losers in this market are the ones who did not spread it out, and those that panicked and sold out...this is not nearly as bad as black monday was ( but the day after black monday was gold tuesday, and we bought all the stocks we could, and doubled our money in 6 months )....always remember, if you follow the crowd, you will get no farther than the crowd....


49 posted on 06/08/2009 7:36:54 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When you ask God for help, sometimes he sends the Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
But CEO compensation didn't cause the crash.

CEO compensation was largely tied to stock price, and corporate policies were keyed mostly to maximizing stock price - often at the cost of re-investing into the company. Been there, done that, seen it.

Which is why efforts should be to cut the size of government to 1/4th the size or less. Out of control government is the recipe for out of control corporations.

Except that corporations are now firmly in bed with government.

50 posted on 06/08/2009 7:37:29 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Does most people’s brains die at 65 years old?

There's no pandering like a liberal Democrat promising to make Social Security "safe for seniors" and Medicare "rock solid".

51 posted on 06/08/2009 7:38:31 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: y6162
I’m just saying “corporate oligarchy” grossly overstates the political power of corporations

I'm not talking about it in the context of controlling corporations. I'm talking about it in the context of a fairly small number of individuals being able to control major corporations through board memberships. That ain't HuffPost talk, that's a basic fact.

52 posted on 06/08/2009 7:38:51 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

We fund the government, or not...

With enough people in agreement that enough is enough.


53 posted on 06/08/2009 7:38:58 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PeterL
Looks like you just post YOUR articles, then refuse to reply to anyone.

Maybe you cannot get a job now because you have bad communication skills?

54 posted on 06/08/2009 7:39:34 AM PDT by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
We fund the government, or not...

Except that congressional districts are set up to be largely non-competitive.

55 posted on 06/08/2009 7:40:16 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon

I am an optimistic person, but it is clear to me that all of the rules have changed. I have no confidence in the economic stimulus plans, although I am a supporter of this President.


He wasn’t issued a thinking cap was he.


56 posted on 06/08/2009 7:42:39 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

>>>>>>> Perhaps therein lays our opportunities. Those of us with first hand experience on how the old rules no longer apply can begin to create the new rules. <<<<<<<<<<<<<

Uh, okay. New rules? Creating new rules? What ‘new rules’?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We find strength as we look to each other for strength. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Uh, okay.

>>>>>>>>>>> Our unique bond expanding into a feeling the connection between us…and this connection feels good and right… <<<<<<<<<<<<

‘feeling the connection between us’ ? R U asking me for money, cause we got no connection !

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we begin to desire this connection…and nurture this connection…and begin to realize what our world could look like if we took care of each other instead of taking care of our self. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<

oh good, so you are going to help take care of me? with what money, you are broke ! so perhaps you are again asking me to take care of you.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not put this into action? <<<<<<<<<<<<

Put WHAT into action ?!?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been talked about often but never implemented. What do we have to lose? <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Good question. A lot I think


57 posted on 06/08/2009 7:44:33 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PeterL
...and begin to realize what our world could look like if we took care of each other instead of taking care of our self. Why not put this into action? It has been talked about often but never implemented. What do we have to lose?

We lose our freedom. Your ideas have been implemented, in the USSR, Cuba, North Korea, and Maoist China. The results are always the same: death, misery and oppression on a previously unimaginable scale.

58 posted on 06/08/2009 7:48:11 AM PDT by LikeLight (http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Except that corporations are now firmly in bed with government.

*Ding, ding, ding* We have a winner!!!!!! Give dirtboy a cupie doll! :)

59 posted on 06/08/2009 7:52:22 AM PDT by Kitsunebi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PeterL
“He who dies with the most toys wins” was a funny bumper sticker, but it is funny no more. I think it is time to end this era of greed and selfishness and over consumption.

Now that YOUR retirement is gone. Did you feel that way in 2006? You were probably ok with it then. I'd say if you feel that it is time to end the era of greed and selfishness, you're off to a good start by going back to work and cancelling retirement. Thanks for going back to work and for contributing once again for the national good.

And I'm not sure about anybody else, but my agressive 401k is actually up this year. I find it hard to believe that a conservative retirement plan would be completely wiped out. The worst I was down in my agressive plan was about 45%.
60 posted on 06/08/2009 7:52:59 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson