Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Hmph! I don't really see the significance of this. My netbook (Lenovo S10e) has been through four OS’s within three months. Three flavors of Linux and finally lighting on Windows 7 where it will probably stay because it plays nicely with Windows Home Server. Linux is great though, it's just not as suited to my network B/U.

My point is that you're not “married” to any of these OS’s when you purchase the netbook. In the case of Lenovo, there was no support for the Suse Linux that the system came with. There wasn't even a driver support page at Lenovo so it is obvious that a user is on his/her own, so why not experiment?

In the end, the netbook worked fine with all the Linux versions I threw at it, and it works quite well with
Windows 7. This thing is NOT a Linux netbook, or a Windows netbook. It is a netbook that can run most any of the mainstream versions thrown at it. IMHO, I think it is dimwitted of any manufacturer to hawk these things as having some sort of proprietary affiliation with the OS suppliers. The machine itself has no allegiance to either Linux or Windows. It is a very “bi” machine.

4 posted on 06/02/2009 3:15:37 AM PDT by Habibi ("We gladly feast on those who would subdue us". Not just pretty words........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Habibi
This thing is NOT a Linux netbook, or a Windows netbook. It is a netbook that can run most any of the mainstream versions thrown at it. IMHO, I think it is dimwitted of any manufacturer to hawk these things as having some sort of proprietary affiliation with the OS suppliers. The machine itself has no allegiance to either Linux or Windows. It is a very “bi” machine.

For people like us that is true. For the vast majority MS's marketing will convince them otherwise. It's about marketing not technology for about 90% of people.

5 posted on 06/02/2009 3:35:52 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Habibi

The disappointing thing about this “relationship” between MS and Asus is the MS tax. Ya gotta pay for Microsoft software. That was one of the appealing things early on with the netbooks that one got as much computer as possible with as little dollars spent, therefore Linux OS.

I was also disappointed when I started looking at them that one had to pay the MS tax to get the better HD. I finally pulled the trigger when the refurbished Linux versions were down to $150, but I have the 4gig SSD, I’m not sure how much Windows 7 I can fit on that.


7 posted on 06/02/2009 4:02:35 AM PDT by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant penguin on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson