Uh no. Obviously no one wants the job or he wouldn’t be in the position. All I am arguing is give him a chance. He can’t screw up any more than the experienced guys who ran both companies into ground did. Why do you have such a problem with that? And who would you rather have because who ever you pull out of your head probably wouldn’t do it anyways.
So since we are stuck with him, let’s see how he does instead of having a hissy fit over it. There’s nothing you or I can do.
The time-honored, tested and true method is to let failing business models fail.
And who would you rather have because who ever you pull out of your head probably wouldn’t do it anyways.
Whoever has the wherewithal to buy the assets at liquidation is, by definition, going to be better qualified than any other choice. And if there's no takers, there's a reason for that too.