Posted on 05/27/2009 8:37:44 AM PDT by Mikey76
Rush is more valuable on the air, getting this stuff out there then as a minimally influential politician.
I agree. Certainly conservatives who would make good at elective office should take a shot at at. The author actually seems to agree with your statement when he says:
"Sam Adams and the Sons of Liberty were not just rabble rousers. Many of them were elected assemblymen who shaped the course of our nation’s history."
Clearly then, there were Sons of Liberty who were "just" rabble rousers (maybe they, like Rush, were doing what they did best, i.e., "rouse" the public [rabble]).
Your headline hd nothing to do with your article. Either that, or you failed to address it.
I always get a chuckle out of people who insist that someone else should step up and represent them.
Franken failed and went to a government job
Rush was persistant and over many seperate failures rose up again and again to become “america’s anchorman”.
Franken is just .....weak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.