And here I just finished reading the one that said rich men are more, ahem, satisfying to women...
this makes my day! :-)
There is a point when trying to please people puts people off. We all want other people to be a bit of a challenge.
What does it really mean to be selfless, anyway? Isn’t sex about both people? And if these guys are truly selfless, does that mean they’d be willing to get a buddy off if he really needed it? Obviously not. You have to get something out of sex to enjoy it. There are some straight guys who engage in homosexual sex without enjoying it, but they do it for the money.
IT guys probably worry about the next time they’ll get laid. Also, their lack of experience may hurt them more than their willingness helps. Practice makes perfect.
Finally, who cares what they say? The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
I don’t know. Seems to me that if you need love “gadgets”, then your own “gadgets” must not be up to par, not to mention your imagination . . . .
wasn’t this the point of “Revenge of the Nerds”?
100% of those 82% lie on sex surveys.
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
No amateurs, please. Send FReepmail if you want on/off ISHP list |
|
The List of Ping Lists |
The author seems to place heavy emphasis on the use of mechanical gadgets; one is forced to wonder where the concept of love fits into all this.
No matter. In future, as Woody Allen has informed us in his movie, “Sleeper,” everyone will have access to the Ultimate Gadget - the Ogasmatron. After that, one will hardly have to resort to other human beings at all for the satisfaction of one’s carnal appetites.
Revenge of the Nerds Pings?
Somehow I don’t think the concepts of “being good in bed” and “willing to use sex devices” are compatible. If one is truly good at this sort of thing, why is a device even needed?
Call me Old Fashioned. The only device I need is my hubby.
Curiously, I am a C#.NET / ASP.NET / SQl 2005 guru.
I knew this all along. ;)
It's because we practice so much when we're alone.
As a retired geek married to another geek....well, you get the idea.