Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cindy

Weight does not necessarily equate to strength. Titanium is lighter and stronger than steel — it is also more expensive. Carbon fiber is lighter and stronger than aluminium — it is also more difficult to work. The current internal combustion petrol engines are not the most efficient way to convert fuel into motion — they are heavy and wasteful.

A better, lighter, stronger, safer, faster car is out there somewhere, and it will be cheap enough to render our existing automobile stock obsolete in a matter of a couple years after it is introduced.

But it isn’t going to be invented by Gummint fiat: just because Obama stamps his foot. And it isn’t going to happen from a Gummint-run GM or Chrysler who remain captives of the auto trade unions.

It will happen as a result of innovation. That happens best in the Free Market: something Obama wouldn’t understand if it jumped up and bit him on his arse.


3 posted on 05/20/2009 4:54:08 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DieHard the Hunter
Weight does not necessarily equate to strength.

Correct, but it does determine how abruptly the car will come to a stop in a collision. More weight means the car can use up some of its kinetic energy in shoving the other car. Coming to a stop in 15 feet instead of 5 feet can easily be the difference between life and death. Lightweight cars can subject the body to lethal G forces.

12 posted on 05/20/2009 12:47:48 PM PDT by Nighttime in America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson