Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Justaham
Well, it did make up for the loss of revenues. http://www.heritage.org/research/features/budgetChartbook/Images/taxes-tax-rates_02-580.jpg

Futher, economic growth lowered the cost of debt so that the government could borrow at a better rate, as well.

2 posted on 05/18/2009 3:24:29 PM PDT by mbraynard (You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mbraynard

gifted amateur, Ronald Reagan

Newsweak can’t go broke fast enough.


4 posted on 05/18/2009 3:29:54 PM PDT by Lets Roll NOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mbraynard
Here:



Clearly the guy who wrote this thing has no trouble with tax rates approaching 100%, nor has he considered the common-sense consequences of such confiscatory taxation. The genius of the Laffer Curve is its simplicity. Tax rates are, at some point, inversely correlated with tax revenues. So simple, but so obvious.
6 posted on 05/18/2009 3:38:02 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson