I get the feeling the ‘reporter’ is a friend of the Professor...and taking what she says at face value.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080319114619.htm
I think the Kon-Tiki was probably more accurate, and certainly underwent a more severe test!
:’) Pretty sure it did. And the professor probably never heard of Heyerdahl in any coherent way.
Having personal experience on the Charles River and coastal areas of the open ocean, I'd suggest that conditions on the open ocean can provide a more severe test of craft stability than the Charles.