Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Rolling Stones ruled the Seventies
Telegraph UK ^ | 5/13/09 | Neil McCormick

Posted on 05/13/2009 12:53:12 PM PDT by pissant

It was in the Sixties that the Rolling Stones first found global fame – but a magnificent new clutch of re-releases from the Seventies confirms it was then that Mick, Keef and the boys struck artistic gold.

Universal Music recently announced the imminent release of "14 remastered classic albums" from the Rolling Stones. It is a laughable claim. They may well be The Greatest Rock And Roll Band In The World (a title they conferred upon themselves when introducing live shows in the late Sixties), but I don't know if anyone but the most rabid fan could name more than a handful of Stones albums still worth listening to in their entirety, particularly when the list of the latest reissues excludes their Sixties heyday.

Yet, the imminent first batch of re-releases from the Seventies (Sticky Fingers, Goats Head Soup, It's Only Rock N Roll and Black and Blue) serve as a potent reminder of exactly why the Stones have endured. For a golden period, they released a series of albums almost untouchable in the pop pantheon as examples of free-flowing, high-spirited, elegantly extemporised blues, country and rock and roll. And, it was the replacement of the increasingly dysfunctional multi-instrumentalist Brian Jones with lyrical, technically audacious, young guitarist Mick Taylor (19 when he joined) that resulted in that golden period.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography
KEYWORDS: rollingstones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: calcowgirl

Traffic “Live in Santa Monica” I think

You tube is fairly liberal with the older artists. They (old rock and roll) don’t care so much about copyrights and are just happy to have the exposure


101 posted on 05/13/2009 3:46:54 PM PDT by dennisw (Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: x
Wasn't Farrah Fawcett in that??
102 posted on 05/13/2009 3:47:50 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Traffic “Live in Santa Monica” I think

in -- at -- close enough. ;-)

You tube is fairly liberal with the older artists. They (old rock and roll) don’t care so much about copyrights and are just happy to have the exposure

Yeah, I've been surprised at the stuff I have been able to find there. I love it! I think enforcement probably falls to the copyright holders -- with youtube deleting them when they receive a complaint. Some musicians' managers must do a better job of policing the website than others.

103 posted on 05/13/2009 3:50:32 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Good memory. She was. But in a supporting role.

Her hair was star-worthy though.

104 posted on 05/13/2009 3:55:00 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: x

She was hotter than a chicken pot pie.


105 posted on 05/13/2009 4:01:05 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Many older artists and their management don’t mind the copyright violations on you tube. They want the exposure and need the exposure

Plus most people aren’t going to download and steal stuff off you tube. It can be done but.....


106 posted on 05/13/2009 4:04:30 PM PDT by dennisw (Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: x

Jenny Agutter was in that. I met her briefly


107 posted on 05/13/2009 4:05:16 PM PDT by dennisw (Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Exile on Main St. is one of the BEST albums ever.

A little known chestnut, Metamorphosis is superb also.


108 posted on 05/13/2009 4:08:20 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

The great travesty of Logans Run, they had both those women on set, and gave the part that had a nude scene to the brunette. I mean you know, she’s not bad, but she’s no Farrah.


109 posted on 05/13/2009 4:10:57 PM PDT by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: pissant

In the mid 70’s there was a battle going on between Zeppelin and the Stones. For us kids Zeppelin won out....nothing beat ‘Stairway to Heaven’ for long, sweaty slow dances.


110 posted on 05/13/2009 4:15:30 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

I have Metamorphosis on vinyl.


111 posted on 05/13/2009 4:17:09 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Good point! I know it has made me buy stuff I had totally forgotten about. Now I'm finding even more cool stuff. Just wow.
Rock Me Baby--BB KIng/Eric Clapton/Buddy Guy/Jim Vaughn
112 posted on 05/13/2009 4:17:20 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

Until Freebird showed up, anyway.


113 posted on 05/13/2009 4:20:20 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Me too!


114 posted on 05/13/2009 4:20:34 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Ditto! I didn’t care for the stones disco flavor they tried in the late 70s.


115 posted on 05/13/2009 4:24:22 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Heard Sympathy for the Devil today at lunch. Almost blew out my trucks speakers. One of my favorites.


116 posted on 05/13/2009 4:25:44 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
The Who playing at the Rolling Stones “Rock and Roll Circus in Dec 69’.

That clip pretty much settles the discussion so far as I'm concerned.

My understanding is that the main reason the Stones never allowed the release of R 'n' R Circus back in the day was because The Who jammed them up so bad.

117 posted on 05/13/2009 6:20:19 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: x
There was a reason why the 70s spawned a movie and television series about a world where people's lives ended at 30.

"I went to go see a movie about the future called 'Logan's Run', and there ain't no n*ggers in it. I said 'Well white folks ain't planning for us to be here!'" - Richard Pryor

118 posted on 05/13/2009 6:25:25 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: pissant; All

Had I been a teen in the 60’s I would have been more of a Stones fan than a Beatles fan..


119 posted on 05/13/2009 7:25:49 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://governorpalin4president.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Yes, that's the long-standing myth about the Rock'n'roll Circus, but, having seen it, I don't agree that the Who outshined the Stones. More likely, in my opinion, was the embarrassment of the Yoko Ono screaming, anti-musical appearance.
120 posted on 05/13/2009 7:29:49 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson