Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ReformationFan
I don't think Taylor could have really prevented the Civil War. It just would have come sooner under his term had he pushed the Southern slaveowners like he wanted to.

As far as putting Lincoln first, I believe Washington deserves that honor. He showed all subsequent presidents how to conduct themselves with restraint and honor, even if they don't always follow his lead. He played a pivotal role in the birth of America and that should never be forgotten.

4 posted on 05/11/2009 8:20:56 PM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheThinker

Agreed. Washington was truly “the indispensable man” in Flexner’s words. America can’t even be imagined without him. He was sui generis.


10 posted on 05/11/2009 9:05:10 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TheThinker

Had the Civil War been fought in 1850, there isn’t much doubt secession would have been successful.

During that 10 years the North grew much faster than the South, creating a much greater imbalance. In particular, the railroads and other industry expanded greatly. Without these assets, Union conquest of the CSA would have been very difficult.


11 posted on 05/12/2009 7:26:17 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson