Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
I respect your opinion and perceptions, but such appearance-related factors do not a legal citizen make, especially if she had been brought here as a young child.

In any event, given my grassroots immigration issues involvement, I am always a little more sensitive to the possible connection between the event and illegal immigration. Oft times, the MSM tries to cover it up. The fact that it was reported that she, initially as it turned out, was reluctant to appear on camera sent off some alarm bells. Cheers.

25 posted on 05/12/2009 5:42:48 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

Amazingly people who appear to want to dispute things with trains come in all colors, kinds, sizes and origins.


27 posted on 05/12/2009 6:01:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
The fact that it was reported that she, initially as it turned out, was reluctant to appear on camera sent off some alarm bells.

That was 4 days ago. In the past 2 days, you cannot get this woman's face off the TV set. Methinks she's perfectly legal, given the fact that if she was not, she would not be showing her face on TV so much.

I think she's also prepping herself up to sue CSX trains or the MARC train system (or Mont. Co. govt.) for not enough railroad crossing warning signs. She's due to give birth in about 2 months, so watch her re-surface again after the baby is born, wanting to get her chunk 'o dough for the trauma suffered.

31 posted on 05/12/2009 6:55:58 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD (Airlines can take their $15-per-checked-bag surcharge and shove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson