[TankerKC]

But comments, like this: “You, and the “Obama File” don’t know enough to recognize your error.” are unnecessary.

It is true. Witness the fact that you are still trying to defend the errors.

We’re just engaged in a discussion. You’re engaged in — I don’t know what?

Correction. It is all a part of the discussion. I know you would love to be able to pass this all off as the Gospel, but it is not.

I post an item from what I conside a reliable source. Fred Nerks re-publishes the larger article, containing the comment from F-16.net here and you go off on us.

If correcting an inaccuracy is "going off" then you I can't help.

[Beckwith]

I’m not trying to defend the writer’s “errors” at all.

I contend that his article is factual, even if his choice of words doesn’t meet your standards of precision.

But this statement, that you made in Post #27:

“ex: there are no 2-seat F-16s...”

Is false.

Here’s the article:

http://www.f-16.net/news_article2511.html

Take it up with the writer.