To: PugetSoundSoldier
So your position is to use tariffs as a means of managing the economy by protecting US firms that you feel need. Nope. My position is that Ronald Reagan selectively used tariffs as a means of managing foreign trade by protecting those sectors of the economy where he had determined such protections best served our nation's economic interests.
Unlike "free trade" absolutists, he wasn't bound to simplistic sloganeering as a substitute for intelligent policy development.
303 posted on
05/11/2009 2:55:06 PM PDT by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: Mojave
OK, so your position on trade is non-existent; however you DO hold that Reagan used trade tariffs selectively. Is that correct?
You hold no position - pro or con - about tariffs. But you hold that Reagan chose to use them to manage trade.
304 posted on
05/11/2009 2:57:03 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: Mojave
My position is that Ronald Reagan selectively used tariffs as a means of managing foreign trade by protecting those sectors of the economy where he had determined such protections best served our nation's economic interests. What is your position on average tariffs when Reagan entered office and when he left office? After 2 terms, were they higher or lower?
305 posted on
05/11/2009 3:11:17 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson