Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PugetSoundSoldier
So your position is to use tariffs as a means of managing the economy by protecting US firms that you feel need.

Nope. My position is that Ronald Reagan selectively used tariffs as a means of managing foreign trade by protecting those sectors of the economy where he had determined such protections best served our nation's economic interests.

Unlike "free trade" absolutists, he wasn't bound to simplistic sloganeering as a substitute for intelligent policy development.

303 posted on 05/11/2009 2:55:06 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave

OK, so your position on trade is non-existent; however you DO hold that Reagan used trade tariffs selectively. Is that correct?

You hold no position - pro or con - about tariffs. But you hold that Reagan chose to use them to manage trade.


304 posted on 05/11/2009 2:57:03 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

To: Mojave
My position is that Ronald Reagan selectively used tariffs as a means of managing foreign trade by protecting those sectors of the economy where he had determined such protections best served our nation's economic interests.

What is your position on average tariffs when Reagan entered office and when he left office? After 2 terms, were they higher or lower?

305 posted on 05/11/2009 3:11:17 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson