I think you are mostly correct . . . particularly about there not being a majority of conservatives in the country.
However, there is a core of Bible Believing folks who could be persuaded by a suitably wise and moving conservative candidate. Sarah Palin showed us that much.
However, at some point compromise we have ceased to be what we must be—both in terms of conservatism and patriotism. At some point, compromise is counterproductive and evil in and of itself.
I’m more for leaning toward MORE conservatism than less . . . just not foolishly.
Yes, Palin attracted lots of attention, but McCain/Palin lost. Putting Palin at the top of the ticket more than likely would not make a difference - I just don’t think that the votes are out there for a 100% Conversative candidate - if they were, why wouldn’t the Republican Party be 100% Conservative?
It seems like of the 100+ million people that voted, most of them simply went for the messenger with the message of change - to most, positions were not assessed, background did not matter. It’s all politics and, frankly, McCain did play hardball, he played softball and at times wasn’t even on the field to play.
My belief is the Newt shold be the next Republican candidate, although he’s not 100% Conservative and has some baggage. Agreement here will not be forthcoming.