But I'm still worried about localism...
To: raccoonradio
To: raccoonradio
Nothing to worry about...No Fairness Doctrine...Just relax...Poppies...Poppies...Poppies will put them to sleep...sleep...sleep...
To: raccoonradio
A “Community advisory board” in Seattle or San Fransisco would be worse and more restrictive than any “Fairness Doctrine” the Feds could conjure up!
4 posted on
05/08/2009 2:36:40 AM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: raccoonradio
You should be, especially when they put up a straw man like the Fairness Doctrine and how they are not going to reestablish it — all to distract from the legal machinations behind the scenes (localism and new licensing rules).
5 posted on
05/08/2009 3:49:45 AM PDT by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(The most dangerous fascists are those with a warm smile and soothing voice.)
To: raccoonradio
I'm all for the “fairness doctrine” if it's applied across the board to all forms of media, i.e. newspapers, television, magazines, the internet, radio, and what ever other mediums out there that disperse news. Libs would be screaming censorship and rightfully so. What I can't understand is when we are only talking about radio that it's somehow not.
6 posted on
05/08/2009 5:02:05 AM PDT by
RU88
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson