Posted on 05/07/2009 4:34:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
What this executive order says, is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not. (See Section 3)
In other words, you aren't going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn't want you to see.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that Obama's first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing.
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released
Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records -- Not released
Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records -- Not released Columbia thesis -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
Go ahead, tell me that this is just a coincidence
that's why I only listed those items that were commonly known:
...the majority of voters chose a man who spent his formative years in a muslim school, had a muslim stepfather, a muslim father...who was a Kenyan National. And openly declared the prettiest sound on earth at sunset was the muslim call to prayer...
they voted for his 'charm' in spite of it all or because it really didn't worry them. (Remember, I am an Australian, just sayin' what it looks like from here.)
Yet.
Problem is, when they get what they wished for, everyone else suffers also. And by everyone else I mean the entire free world, what's left of it.
Yes, the young especially were mesmerized by him. As for the others, I'm sure that all ‘on the dole’ voted for him. Remember the lady who actually thought he would pay her mortgage and bills?
The older people who voted for him just didn't realize the extent of his ambitions, they were the uninformed. Even we are stunned by things he is doing.
My son spent time in Australia about three years ago. I recall reading at the time that there were ‘mu-slim’ camps there that depicted themselves as ‘paintball’ camps. Always wondered about that.
There was a group in Sydney, run by a muslim baggage handler, who had a ‘youth training camp’ in bushland where evidence of explosive materials and pipe bomb manufacture was discovered. The self appointed imam whose name I have thankfully forgotten, is now in jail.
Another case in Victoria also ended in lengthy prison terms.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24350617-28737,00.html
LOL! At our last elections, we had one just like her. She replied, when asked why she voted for Rudd, (the Labor Party) -
because he is going to make it easier for me to buy a house...
Thanks for the link Fred. I’m glad to know they did something about these ‘training camps’.
.
Thanks for the ((((ping )))) potlatch
The Aussies appear to act faster on Muzzie training camps and I doubt that they will put up with BS from the increasing radical Islamic population there -
Here in the USA we here “America will never be at war with Islam!” from Obama
My sentiments exactly. They get what they voted for, and they deserve it, but we get it too and don't.
[ Thanks for the ((((ping )))) potlatch ]
- - You’re welcome devolve.
that guy’s arm clearly looks photoshopped...look at the pixels and the jagged edges
although the other picture doesn’t look natural either
can somebody tell me the story of this picture and the theory behind it
It was suggested that were he to be removed from the photo, the grandparents would fit together nicely in a natural pose.
In order to accomplish the removal of the young man and bring the grandparents (back) together, it was necessary to replace the parts removed by the insertion (and overlay) of the young man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.