What, specifically, do you want me to do about it?
My opinion that school instruction is full of expensive, high-tech crap is irrelevant to how my Congresscritter, Mrs. Myrick, votes on things like this. In fact, I have no idea how she votes, because I'm much more interested in her positions on national defense and immigration.
“My opinion that school instruction is full of expensive, high-tech crap is irrelevant to how my Congresscritter, Mrs. Myrick, votes on things like this. In fact, I have no idea how she votes, because I’m much more interested in her positions on national defense and immigration.”
A DVD player ($35) and TV ($200) rolled from classroom to classroom is “expensive and high tech”?
And once again, to dispute your point, much less TIME (and time is money) is spent in showing this video on a less than $250 total equipment cost SHARED expense than having the teacher recite it.
You’ve got it BACKWARDS. MPAA and RIAA lobbied to change EXISTING copyright law.
They are the ones wasting your congresscritter’s time on copyright law.
The school is doing as always has been permitted under the law.
Big Media doesn’t like it.