Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

I know very little about all this economic stuff, so I’m probably all wet on this.

The Fed stopped reporting M3 in March 2006. Included in M3 are Repurchase Agreements. Some, perhaps many, Credit Default Swaps and other Derivatives are Repurchase Agreements.

So, the huge uptick in CDS’ and other Derivatives (of home mortgages) would have been easier to see if the Fed had continued to report M3, no?

Even so, the components would still have been available to Greenspan, Bernanke, and Paulson way before Paulson and Bernanke suddenly announced in the Fall of 2008 how much trouble we were in. Did any of those three men raise any red flags about this stuff before the Fall of 2008?

But I’m merely displaying my lack of knowledge of these things.


4 posted on 05/04/2009 6:07:19 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace

bttt


5 posted on 05/04/2009 6:10:21 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace
Some, perhaps many, Credit Default Swaps and other Derivatives are Repurchase Agreements.

Nope. They are totally different things. Repos are simply short-term loans collateralized by Treasuries or other securities.

6 posted on 05/04/2009 7:35:31 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson