| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 04/30/2009 7:26:10 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 04/30/2009 7:08:33 PM PDT by JoeProBono
“Why is it that the libs never get burned with a Souter like we did? (IE: Someone we thought was OK when Bush 41 nominated him)”
When Warren Rudman was out there backing him, I thought Souter would be a disaster.
White (appointed by Kennedy) and Frankfurter (by FDR) turned out a lot more conservative than liberals thought they’d be. But yes, it seems that it’s always the conservative appointees who “grow” - that is, go left.
Justice Anthony “Flipper” Kennedy being a good example.
No net loss. A Lib will replace a Lib.
Jamie Gorelick.
Because no matter how conservative the judge, once they get to Washington the urge to seek the clucking approval of the media/intellectual elite and the cocktail circuit pulls them left. It’s like gravity.
That great NOTTTT
That great NOTTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.