Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

As a long time linux user I find it just a little bit hard to understand when Ubuntu x.x.x is somehow compared to Vista, or Windows 7 as saying it’s finally spiffy, or fast or whatever.

A distro to my way of thinking is just that - a distro.

It’s not really a new “program” - it’s just a new bundle of programs. You could run the same linux kernel or same nvidia driver (or whatever) with 100’s of other linux distros or variants.

So what is the basis for saying that Ubuntu y.y.y (or Red Hat or Suse or whatever) is “sluggish” but Unbuntu x.x.x is “great”? It seems (to me anyway) that all this a) incremental and b) academic since you could upgrade your drivers from other distros all day long.


20 posted on 04/26/2009 10:43:57 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
I think it is the mentality of windows...and Mac I suppose...

You get a disk....you install it ....voila....that is it....what is all of this downloading stuff you talk about?

21 posted on 04/26/2009 12:30:30 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson