To: AUH2O Repub
Geez! Let me pop in here with a concrete example for you:
Suppose you identify a gene that produces a particular type of cancer tumor. So, you introduce a retro-virus into a patient with said tumors, to "tag" the cells to produce the "glow under UV" effect.
Now, with the proper instrumentation, you "light up" and identify all the tumors for treatment, whether that treatment be targeted chemicals or radiation, or surgical removal.
Treatment of said cancer becomes MUCH more complete, and less risky for the patient. Follow up scans become MUCH more effective, to spot cancerous regrowth.
Yeah, pretty hideous stuff, I don't see how I could live with myself after doing that.
36 posted on
04/25/2009 6:26:15 PM PDT by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
To: Rebel_Ace
And two years later it is discovered that this genetic freak has a much worse cancer.
37 posted on
04/25/2009 6:58:44 PM PDT by
AUH2O Repub
(Should have been Thompson/Hutchinson)
To: Rebel_Ace
If I were going to be introducing a retro-virus into a tumor as you described, I think I’d program it with some means of killing the tumor. For instance, I’d tell it to turn off an essential tumor gene. If I want to visualize tumor cells, I think I’d use something other than a retrovirus, like some sort of fluorescent dye that binds only to the tumor cells.
Science is such fascinating stuff. ;-)
43 posted on
04/25/2009 10:31:17 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson