Wow, I just read though the article. For ranting and raving it wins a gold medal. For actually providing a discernable argument it fails utterly. ICR won in Federal court when California tried to do the same thing some years back, so one would expect they know exactly what to do to win again. This critic is going to look very foolish, I expect.
Anyone with any knowledge of the law knows that the arguments are excellent. The lawyer who wrote the complaint doesn't understand some very, very basic legal concepts such as when a statute of limitations starts to run and whether or not you can enjoin someone to do something.