I didn’t say it’s a DOS application. i said it’s part of the ongoing evidence of DOS’s continued existence and influence in Windows. You really need to read what I write and stop responding to stuff I didn’t because it’s making you look like a person who just can’t admit simple reality. If you think Windows isn’t carrying DOS baggage you’re simply delusional.
How is a 32/64 bid application - written from the ground up - evidence of a dos heritage?
Do you think that sh/bash/zsh show that Unix/linux has a dos heritage too?
I really am surprised that you haven’t brought up c: d: e:f: yet.