I will tell you that whether you and many female nick freepers on this thread like it or not the boy will have some visitation and custody at some point with his child if he wants it. Period.
What facts do you have btw any more than I do. Much of it is media speculation..
The boy is simply not accountable for his mom's actions though it might affect child's domicile issues. I expect a guardian ad litum could determine these issues and present to the court. I never said the baby should be living in the mom's house as you did...I clarified it well enough, sorry you overlooked that.
btw....I'm on the side of the baby. If the daddy wants to be in the baby's life then he should be and most courts agree.
i have been through this extensively over a 4 year period, I doubt most of you have.
but don't fear, it's still heavily slanted towards the mom custody wise...it's one of post feminism's little hypocrisies
a dad has to be willing to really duke it out and the mom must be truly extremely unfit...just a regular over indulging bratty hollering but failing to follow through with discipline mom will still get primary custody.
I'm sure the Palin's will be great parents and I bet they will want the boy involved.
I don’t care how old he is, he can still be a good father. I hope he would be.
I agree that he should see his son.
i don’t agree that his mother’s drug habits will not be an issue, with her in the same house as Levi.
I know we don’t really know all the details and I’m perfectly willing to leave it to the principals in this case (i’m generous that way heehee), but I don’t care for this kid having the money for a lawyer and an agent, but not having money or job to support this child.