“I only get p.o. when none of owners admit to the possibility of the breed being dangerous.”
Yes. Don’t think you’ll find many of those types around here.
I try to educate that all dogs are potentially dangerous.
As a rule the larger the dog is,
and this includes ‘pitbulls’,
the greater is the potential danger.
Although at the extreme ends of victims,
the very young and the very old,
even small dogs can cause terrible damage.
I don’t subscribe to the idea that “my dog would never do that”.
Even a ‘good’ dog can get into trouble
if the owner slips up on his/her responsibility.
Bless you for taking in the rescue
and giving the old girl care and a good home
during the time she has left.
Just in the first 50 posts there was much hatred spewed toward Chet99 and much delusion about pits...Post #7 made a stupid remark about pits not being human aggressive. When I asked her what species kept being sent to the hospital and morgue because of pits mauling. she had no answer as to what species it was...Post from /slings and arrows made it personal about Chet, inferring a pit bull ran off with his wife...What a bunch of BS you PB owners spew under the guise of humor...
This whole thread has one objective SHUT UP CHET and anyone that agrees with him....Such liberal horse pucky is what the political class is trying to do with conservative talk show hosts...Isolate, attack, ridicule so as to shut up differing opinions. I see many multiple posts from the same source, posted by different people, big deal. Chet does not post the same article over and over...Sad to say each one is a different attach...Don't like his posts, don't click and then complain and make fun of him. Grow up and don't click on his posts...I personally like them and it does keep people informed. Please spare me anymore sanctimonious lectures. Saul Alinskys rules for radicals. Isolate, ridicule to shut them up and then destroy them...Real commie piece of work to use those rules against a fellow freeper....