If it was a 5 year marriage I'd agree with you .... 30 something years ... yeah .. HALF.
Let's see. If her "share" is 4800 per day thats about 10000 per day for both of them, that HE contributed to their marriage. Assuming that she had a dental job at $15/hr, she contributed about 15*8 = 120/day. So she contributes 120/day vs his 10,000/day.
But she "deserves" half huh? What happened to the conservative credo of self-responsibility?
I've always had a hatful of questions about the feminist ethic of committing grand larceny on a successful man on your way out the door as a way for a "liberated" woman to succeed. The feminist ethic that the best way for a woman to succeed is to latch onto a successful man is sorta schitzoid. A mental defect.
She "deserves" 500 million dollars because he cheated on her? in what way does one make up for the other? and who's setting the 500 million price tag on her heartache? Setting a price on her "heartbreak" just turns her into a whore.
Once he had some cash and influence coming in, she could have taken the time to retrain in practically any kind of job she desired and contributed a significant amount to THEIR lives together. But no. She went the Peg Bundy route sitting on the couch and growing stupid by the light of Oprah and sucking down the bon-bon's as fast as possible.
Nobody on this forum or off will EVER convince me that she has ever done anything in her life to earn $500 million. Entitled maybe as in govt entitlement, since apparently "conservative" women have little hesitation in using Uncle Thug as a club to get their way against a successful man, but "earned", nah!