[Ted Grant]

No, I am not a supreme court nominee. I’m just pointing out that in the Judeo part of the Judeo-Christian tradition, no fault divorce was acceptable and moral for 1,000s of years.

I think if at least one party wants out of the marriage, he or she should do it, with no financial penalty. Maintaining a 50% interest in marital property is contingent on being married, not contingent on staying faithful.

I just don’t see the upside of forcing two people to remain married when one person wants out.

[fr_freak]

I think if at least one party wants out of the marriage, he or she should do it, with no financial penalty. Maintaining a 50% interest in marital property is contingent on being married, not contingent on staying faithful.

I just don’t see the upside of forcing two people to remain married when one person wants out.

I already addressed both of these points. The way a debate works is: point-counter point-counter counter point, etc. If you are going to repeat the same thing over and over, I'm not going to waste my time with you.