To: Daffynition
"...70 per cent higher incidence of microscopic bleeding..."
70% higher than what? This is meaningless. You can't say something is "higher" without stating what the "higher" is compared to!
This could simply mean 70% higher than .001%, which is like .002%. Woop-tee-do.
5 posted on
04/15/2009 3:33:44 AM PDT by
joseph20
(...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
To: joseph20
THANK YOU for that post. Media people are constantly trying to stampede us with numbers; the CNN report on American guns in the Mexican drug wars being a perfect example.
Either that in this case, or they don’t understand it themselves- which means they have no business trying to influence the public mind with it.
6 posted on
04/15/2009 3:46:09 AM PDT by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: joseph20
But it is clear for the vast majority of aspirin users that the benefits far outweigh the risks. Probably higher than the control group, but the conclusion, nonetheless is it does more good than harm.
8 posted on
04/15/2009 3:57:30 AM PDT by
dawn53
To: joseph20
11 posted on
04/15/2009 4:40:39 AM PDT by
Daffynition
(Have you noticed Obama voters are having buyer's remorse?)
To: joseph20
Well, I hear there’s a 70% higher chance of dying by drinking too much water. The phenomenon is better known by the colloquial term... “drowning”...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson