Has a single situation ever been proven beyond a reasonable doubt? No. Good luck, keep on trying, though.
Gotta give credit to someone who can stick with a false premise through so much. The tenacity is astounding. Very impressive.
Thanks, Travis.
I don’t have much choice, if I want to deal in the truth and accept the truth. I’ve studied too much and blessed with too much info from many high quality sources and international experts in the field.
IN ADDITION TO my relative that worked around the stuff.
It would be like . . . hmmmm . . . like . . .
trying to convince myself that Navajos were not Native Americans with a homeland in NM and AZ.
The naysaying stuff REALLY IS UTTERLY IDIOTIC and clueless to me. Some naysayERs may be earnest reasonable blokes under all the nonsense . . . but their
REAL AND DEADLY ADDICTION TO A VERY SERIOUS AND TRUE TYPE II ERROR RISK is utterly incredible
AND MOST . . . WHAT . . . 99% ARE EVEN CLUELESS ABOUT
THAT!
And most naysayers are alarmingly rabidly willfully blind—fiercely assaultive, hostile etc. and likely extremely disagreeable folks to live with or work around.
THAT, for this psychologist is a WHOLE OTHER curiosity. WHAT ON EARTH triggers such assaultive hostility from them? PARTICULARLY OVER SOMETHING THEY DO NOT THINK IS TRUE!
They are getting soooooooo fiercely hostile and assaultive over what they see as a FALSEHOOD??? Goodness, what do they do about something they think IS TRUE AND IMPORTANT—GO FREAKING OUT FULL BLOWN PSYCHOTIC IN A FLASH???? AMAZING.
Their brittle haughty, arrogant, prickly hostility is indicative of someone who’s not all that happy with themselves nor with life and relationships in general. What fun is there in living with THAT kind of attitude or perspective???? I’d wager that if any of them have teenagers, they are in a very tortured and conflicted relationship with those teens unless the teen is super laid back and uncaring about such idiotic harsh parenting—tending toward being passive and compliant to the max with the crazy parent.
The UFO stuff will out itself in due course. I hope it takes longer to do so than it appears set to do. But I have no doubt about that. 0.000000000000000% doubt. It’s only a matter of time just as it’s only a matter of time until the overt global government takes over tyrannical control of the planet very publicly.
Those things are absolute certainties. No doubt whatsoever.
However, the relationship problems of most of the naysayers will not change that easily . . . not go away that easily. They appear to be a very abrasive, derisive, unpleasant and disagreeable sort of person to be around. Their families have to experience them even MORE that way. Such features of personalities aren’t just manifested in one discrete area of a life—they pervade the life and virtually all that person’s relationships. THAT is very sad, to me.
Anyway—they are great foils for keeping the threads bumped up and energized. I thank them for that.
And, they proved some perverse fun in whacking back at their idiotic assertions and absurd meanness.
Actually a lot of UFO situations have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
The naysayers and debunkers demonstrate a wholesale
LACK
of reason at all in such cases. They tend to be utterly clueless screaming idiots with not a fair-minded objective cell in their brains on such cases. It’s really quite amazing to watch as a psychologist.
The Cash Lundrum affair is one. The Roswell case is one. The missile warhead getting zapped by a UFO on film is another. The Malstrom AFB case is another. The Keksburg sp? case is another. The Rendlesham Forest case is another.
All those cases are well proven in quadruplicate many times over beyond a reasonable doubt. Any noise to the contrary is not even sane, actually.
Any noise to the contrary is some sort of delusional wish fulfillment—skepticism built on more fog and silliness than any UFO believer was ever even accused of. The hypocrisies on the debunker side of things is absolutely outrageous.
Actually, Travis,
I think YOU might just possibly be brighter about such things than that post would imply.
Or have you just failed to examine all the evidence?
Or did you forget to turn your anemic fair-mindedness module on when you were reading such things?