UFO or not UFO? Area 51 declassifying pours cold water on theory..

The Tech Herald ^ | April 12th, 2009 | Rich Bowden

[Quix]

That the naysayers have been oblivious to that shift in reality is very telling. Willfully blind, indeed.

---

INDEED.

Though in the last 6-18 months, that picture has been changing increasingly dramatically.

[Quix]

A THOROUGHLY INADEQUATE ASSUMPTION

THOROUGHLY UNSUPPORTED BY MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF EVIDENCE.

[Quix]

What balderdash.

How convenient.

Again, murderers are sent to execution on FAR, FAR, FAR LESS evidence and far far far fewer witnesses and expert testimony.

[Quix]

Because in some respects, we don’t give a rip

if a dyed-in-the-wool naysayer has a death grip on nonsensical assumptions and interpretations.

Folks that well insulated blindly AGAINST MOUNTAINS of quality evidence deserve to be deluded.

[Quix]

BALDERDASH.

That doesn’t have a SINGLE thing to do with it on the part of ANYONE on the 150+ member ping list that I know of.

WE ARE MERELY FOLLOWING THE EVIDENCE WHEREVER IT LEADS.

[Quix]

INDEED.

[Quix]

WRONG.

EZEKIEL’s ‘chariot’ fits your description quite well.

[Quix]

INDEED.

[Quix]

THANKS TO THE MAX.

IT’S SOOOOOOOOOOOOO REFRESHING TO READ SOMEONE ELSE

WHO HAS AN ACCURATE AWARENESS of what goes on

on these threads.

And why exercises in futility are no longer very attractive.

[Quix]

INDEED.

[Hulka]

Is the earth the only habited planet in the universe?

The only planet with sentient life?

If so, then your hypothesis might be correct.

If not, then your hypothesis is overbroad.

In either case, we have no proof either way of either scenario.

[Quix]

It VIRTUALLY NEVER

matters what evidence

nor the quality of the evidence we provide . . .

it is ALWAYS met with derision.

And that’s “scientific.”

ROTFLOL! TO THE MAX.

[Quix]

SOOOOOOOOO

THE DEATH GRIP you have on your blind biases

AUTOMATICALLY

equal Deke telling the truth

AND THE ASTRONAUTS ON THE SCENE AS LYING.

THAT’S SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

SCIENTIFIC AND SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OBJEVTIVE

AND SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IMPRESSIVE.

PUKE.

[Hulka]

Prove a negative?

[Quix]

Or are you just one of the run of the mill *Scoffers*

---

Being overly generous?

[Quix]

INDEED!

[Hulka]

How do we tell the difference between technology of man and technology of Demons?

[Quix]

BALDERDASH.

[Quix]

We do our part to try and keep the NAYSAYERS

off the streets.

[Quix]

GREAT NARRATIVE.

Thx.