... no, after firing him, the Times published a 7,239-word front-page story investigating what happened, headlined “Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception.” The story called the Blair scandal “a low point in the 152-year history of the newspaper.”
That, of course, wasn’t an issue of right- or left-leaning bias, but of out-and-out lying; combining discussions of the two makes it more difficult to get to the bottom of either (though I’m pretty sure the Blair thing has been all sussed out).
All of the major news media outlets have been caught red handed outright fabricating the news.
Unnamed sources are common and reports that the troops ALL love the man don’t pass the smell test. He’s cutting their budgets, disarming their forces, and they are supposed to be happy when the CEO stands there for a photo op. Nothing in it rings true.