Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan

“I would say the US Open or British Open is more difficult to win than the Master’s.”

It doesn’t matter. There are harder cycle courses than the Tour de France, but the Tour de France is universally recognized as THE premier cycle event.

Wimbleton? Same thing for tennis.

Same is true of the Masters. Sure there are harder courses, and tournaments with more competition, but at the end of the day none of them carry the same prestiege as winning The Masters.

Even the most casual golf fan around the world (I’m talking people who don’t even play golf) knows who won The Masters. I doubt those people have any idea who won the US or British Opens (if they even know what those events are.)

Everyday people that don’t even play or follow the sport will talk around the water cooler about who won this year’s Tour de France, Wimbleton, and Masters. These events are just in a league of their own. Trying to deny that is just trying to deny reality.


106 posted on 04/06/2009 12:57:30 PM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven
One thing I really like about Masters is that one hears very few fools in the gallery screaming "you da man!" and "in the hole!" I suspect people in green jackets escort those types out of the premises in short order.

I also like the fact that the tourney only has two sponsors, and that commericials are both short (two consecutive 30 sec. spots) and few and far between.

The Masters is a class act all the way around.

128 posted on 04/07/2009 9:30:19 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson