I don’t think so.
If TRUTH was your paragon priority, then you’d be much more rational and reasonable about the balance between a
TYPE I ERROR RISK
VS A
TYPE II ERROR RISK
INSTEAD
of putting all your eggs in the basket toward avoiding only a TYPE I ERROR RISK.
That virtually INSURES that you will suffer at least some horrific TYPE II ERRORS.
Whatever. Why do you waste your time making up terms that make sense to nobody but you, and then acting as if you are making a good point?
It would be different if you used terms that actually exist, and asked your interlocutor to consider alternate meanings...but instead you’re just wasting good computer memory.