I am the author to this article and I did not contribute any money to the Obama campaign.
The primary sources for information on this article on Poverty were the Heritage Foundation (see No.1713 of January 5, 2005) article called Understanding Poverty in America by Robert Rector and Kirk Johnson and “household income in the USA” in Wikipedia which identifies all of the primary sources for their work.
I am suspicious of you because of the inaccuracies of your Post and suspect that you are a plant from the FAR LEFT or the Obama Administration -—but I would hope that my suspicion is incorrect.
You said — I am the author to this article and I did not contribute any money to the Obama campaign.
—
Well, it would have made things a lot clearer, then..., if you had simply said you were the author. The way it’s indicated at the top of the post (and also with the same name at the end of the post), it says that “Stephen Einhorn” is the author.
Now, when looking that up (and since it was not indicated that you were the author) — that name, on the web, shows a contribution to Obama and to the Democrats, in the amount of $5,300.
That’s documented on the web.
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
And then you said — I am suspicious of you because of the inaccuracies of your Post and suspect that you are a plant from the FAR LEFT or the Obama Administration -but I would hope that my suspicion is incorrect.
—
I don’t see any inaccuracies in my posts to you. I said there was no link, and indeed there is none (as you never indicated that you were the author).
I said the material did not exist anywhere else on the web, and indeed, it does not.
I said that Stephen Einhorn contributed $5,300 to Obama and the Democrats, and indeed, he did.
There are no inaccuracies in those posts....
Following up, again, on the other parts of your statement...
You said — The primary sources for information on this article on Poverty were the Heritage Foundation (see No.1713 of January 5, 2005) article called Understanding Poverty in America by Robert Rector and Kirk Johnson and household income in the USA in Wikipedia which identifies all of the primary sources for their work.
—
You know, in case you haven’t been posting here very much, the way people do things on Free Republic, is that they give the links for the material that they are citing.
For example, you mention that source material. All that is necessary to do is simply “source it”... like...
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg1713.cfm
—
I guess you’re just not familiar with posting very much on Free Republic...
It would have been easy to have simply labeled this as a “vanity”, saying that you’re the author and you took the information from “such and such” source material, provide the link and that’s it.
Then it would have all been very clear and it would have avoided the “20 questions”... LOL...
—
However, I would still like to know what Stephen Einhorn has to do with this and why he gave $5,300 to the Democrats....??
I also went over to Wikipedia to take a look at their article...
Link — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
I also noticed they had something else there, which indicated some contradiction (but I didn’t check it out to see exactly what they were talking about...) You can see it at this link...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_in_the_United_States
At least we have the links to some of the source/background material for what you are saying...
And..., in regards to the contributions to the Democrats for Stephen Einhorn..., see the following...
http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/stephen-einhorn.asp?cycle=08
It turns out that the $5,300 given by Stephen Einhorn was for the years 2007-2008. The *total* from 1999 has actually been $15,100 — it seems...
Interesting...