Comments to you:
1. You are absolutely correct that somewhere there is a Stephen Einhorn who contributed to the Obama campaign. However, it was not this Stephen Einhorn. So, either stop writing the fiction that I contributed to the Obama campaign or verify that it is ME that contributed the money.
2. If there is any specific information or facts that I presented which are inaccurate, then please point them out.
It is a fact that I did write this article and that it was based on information from the IRS, the Treasury and the Heritage Foundation. So you can just stop the innuendo and concentrate on the facts.
Can you point out any fact that I presented in my article that was incorrect? I doubt it....
Steve
PS What if some Steve Einhorn somewhere donated money to Obama. Whatdoes that have to do with the accuracy of my posting? My posting basically says that any further redistribution of wealth —by Obama (who wants to achieve this) or anyone else — is not necessary..
You said — So, either stop writing the fiction that I contributed to the Obama campaign or verify that it is ME that contributed the money.
—
Well.., it seems that you’re not reading/comprehending very well — or — posting very well... LOL... You don’t have dyslexia do you?
You won’t find a comment by me that says you contributed to the Obama campaign. What you will find me posting is that Stephen Einhorn posted to the Obama campaign....
And since you don’t seem to know how to construct your posts, you might make it clear (that is..., only *if* you want to; but most *do not*) that *you* are Stephen Einhorn (if that is indeed the fact and *if* you wish to say so, but you don’t have to). All that matters here is that you post under the pseudonym of “astudent”. And when I’ve posted to *you* — I’ve posted to “astudent”.
When I’ve said something about “Stephen Einhorn” (whomever that is, as I actually have no idea who that guy is... other than his campaign contributions to Obama...) — I’ve also documented the stuff about Stephen Einhorn...
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
And then you said — . If there is any specific information or facts that I presented which are inaccurate, then please point them out.
It is a fact that I did write this article and that it was based on information from the IRS, the Treasury and the Heritage Foundation. So you can just stop the innuendo and concentrate on the facts.
—
Well, you do seem to have a bit of trouble comprehending things. You’ll notice that my first comment was *Where is the link?*.... LOL... You post an “article” and provide no link to verify the article was on the web *somewhere* and so..., failed to reference it with that link. You’ll notice that there is a “link” space provided in the posting form on Free Republic.
Since you *failed* to post this as a *VANITY* — then the only other assumption is that this is an article posted somewhere on the net that you’ve *failed* to provide the link for. And in addition to that, you provided some supposed “author” of the article, in both the form that you filled out when posting it (instead of indicating it was from “astudent”... LOL...) plus indicating the supposed author at the bottom of the article itself...
If you had posted as a *VANITY* and had placed the “name” of the author as “astudent” — then no one would have been questioning anything about the source of the article, because *then* it would be apparent that you, as the poster, were “spouting off” out of your own mouth....
So, the *facts* are — seemingly — you have no idea how to post stuff here... :-)
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
And then you said — Can you point out any fact that I presented in my article that was incorrect? I doubt it....
Ummmm..., where did I state that something was incorrect in your article. I hadn’t even gotten as far as that part of it, yet. I was trying to find out where the article was posted on the Internet, and who the author was, since you failed to mention you were posting a *VANITY* ... LOL...
All I’ve been doing is trying to document where this supposed “article” came from, since it *finally* becomes apparent *now* that you posted as — “astudent” — but indicated that the author was some guy named “Stephen Einhorn” (whoever that is... other than an Obama contributor...).
I hope you’ve finally learned how to post a *VANITY* now... :-) — so we all know when *you* are “spouting off” versus us reading a legitimate article from some other source on the Internet...