To: Neverforget01
Doesn’t this woman own any suits? She was supposedly a “high-power” career woman. When I worked in an office in a management capacity, I wouldn’t have worn that outfit to work let alone to a meeting with dignitaries. She looks like a low-level typist (no disrespect to typists).
167 posted on
04/01/2009 10:36:07 AM PDT by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Doesnt this woman own any suits? Apparently she goes for the Aunt Esther signature cardigan look
173 posted on
04/01/2009 11:24:47 AM PDT by
Neverforget01
(Talk is cheap...except when Congress does it.)
To: 2nd amendment mama; stanz; NautiNurse
Doesnt this woman own any suits? She was supposedly a high-power career woman. When I worked in an office in a management capacity, I wouldnt have worn that outfit to work let alone to a meeting with dignitaries. She looks like a low-level typist (no disrespect to typists).Good point. As I said above, I think Michelle can be attractive, but I just don't 'get' her fashion sense. She should in no way be compared to Jackie O... wishful thinking on the part of the MSM.
174 posted on
04/01/2009 11:25:50 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(DemocRATs: The party of tax cheats and other assorted crooks)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson