Do “enemies of the state” usually leave behind their DNA on rape or murder victims? How does the state get the DNA from an unknown “enemy”, and how do they know he is an “enemy”?
“DNA crimes” are almost invariably rapes or murders; where someone commits a crime and leaves behind their DNA.
If we need to violently resist our government, them knowing my DNA is not going to help them- as I will make no secret of my identity or my general intent; I will however keep secret my location and my tactics.
However I also see the likelihood of a second armed American revolution within my lifetime as somewhere between slim and none.
We had our revolution; so far it is a success. The people get the government they vote for. If they vote for stupidity, on their own head be it, and hopefully a few years of socialist incompetence will teach them better.
Incorrect. Somebody can leave behind their DNA on a cigarette butt, a napkin, some fallen hairs. The reason why DNA analysis is connected with serious felonies is that it's mainly in serious felonies that authorities can justify the expense of going for DNA analysis.
Jeepers allmendream — I think you're missing PapaBear's point. Who determines whether someone is an "enemy of the state" or an "illegal gun owner" in the first place? It seems to me you are remarkably blythe about this danger.
And naïve about this one:
The people get the government they vote for. If they vote for stupidity, on their own head be it, and hopefully a few years of socialist incompetence will teach them better.So what if a "few years of socialist incompetence will teach them better." The real issue is, being now in a more realistically informed state, whether they would then be in any position to rectify the damage, having been thoroughly stripped of their liberties....