Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2harddrive

Yes, indirectly, by driving up demand; not by restricting supply.


5 posted on 03/24/2009 6:29:09 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring

My understanding is that the military has its own source for ammunition (e.g. Lake City) that is separate from civilian manufacturers. Having said that, I’m sure our current Fed government is at least indirectly responsible through stoking fears of confiscatory taxation, confiscation, etc.

I also think (and my range experience confirms it) that a lot of ammunition is being expending via the “SWAT teams” that every Mayberry police force seems to think is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.


12 posted on 03/24/2009 6:34:52 AM PDT by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson