Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ignorancerunsrampant

Some local municipalities may consider it trafficking child pornography, even if it’s a child doing the trafficking. That may explain the fine. I think there should be consequences for both parties. I don’t think you should just blame the boy for circulating a picture a girl made the choice to send him in the first place. Choices have consequences. For everyone.


71 posted on 03/24/2009 11:03:41 AM PDT by erkyl (The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: erkyl

I send several things per day. Everything that I send has a disclaimer. If a girl sends a picture to a guy she would be slightly more bright than dim to attach a disclaimer that says it is intended for the person it was sent and that the person receiving it is not allowed to duplicate, replicate, forward, or diseminate under penalty of law.


74 posted on 03/25/2009 8:15:48 AM PDT by ignorancerunsrampant (Where is the Court of Common Sense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson