To: Vigilanteman
Girls who plan to remain virgins until marriage have no need to get it.
Once married, will those girls be engaging in sexual intercourse with their husbands?
10 posted on
03/23/2009 7:35:58 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: mysterio
Of course they will mysterio! And we all know that good little Freepers will have good little children who will marry good little men.
(that was total sarcasm by the way)
25 posted on
03/23/2009 7:57:45 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
To: mysterio
Yep. But husbands who don't sleep around are unlikely sources of the virus. I hate to pat myself on the back, but I am one such husband and suspect I'm not such an anomaly as the enemedia would like us to think. Not all men have the morals of Tom Cats, particularly conservative men.
29 posted on
03/23/2009 7:59:58 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: mysterio; MamaTexan; Paleo Conservative; ConservaTexan; Politicalmom; CindyDawg; BykrBayb; ...
Pap tests will still be needed and those girls should be getting them anyway.
Someone recently posted some statistics that most of the cases of cervical cancer occurred in women who either have not had a PAP test in the last 5 years and/or are extremely sexually active, as in prostitutes.
There is the added risk factor that excessive exposure to sperm increases the chance of cervical cancer.
Offer the vaccine? Sure. Mandate it? NEVER!
62 posted on
03/23/2009 2:38:20 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson