Well, that’s where possible criminal action might be involved? Seems to me shareholders might be shocked to know that group of 25 or so were “off limits” to monitoring and could do as they wished, no matter the risk.
Who did the “OFF LIMITS” order come from would be a better question. That probably came from much higher up and long before the whole thing went down at the end of the year.
Those 25 people are probably protected or “throw aways” who will end up getting crucified for people much higher than them.
People in government.
There's no criminal action here. Liddy's statement is false and meaningless. Liddy's just moving his mouth and making noise to divert attention from the real problem, which is that those AIG clowns didn't know and understand what they were doing. They were incompetent and that was proven by their catastropic failure.