Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarpon

Still, the SSD seems like a good fit for static content storage needs. X-rays and such.


12 posted on 03/16/2009 1:47:19 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Well if you are going to store lots of stuff, then you want the latest 1.5 TB hard disks ... Still the cheapest way to store lots of stuff. They can be slowed down or even spun down for power savings at the expense of access times.

HD seem to go up in capacity and remain mostly constant in price. It's the way they are built that determines price, so cramming the most on a platter is the never ending foot race. I just bought a 500 GB SATA high speed drive for $60.

At the last juncture, people said conventional recording had pooped out. Then came vertical recording. We were doing vertical recording way back in the early 80s.

Is suppose if you want to archive store, the optical is what you may want, especially if you want it portable.

15 posted on 03/16/2009 1:53:18 PM PDT by Tarpon (It's a common fact, one can't be liberal and rational at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson