[BGHater]

We a referring to the document you posted. He was considered a outlaw by the document. If he was a terrorist, perhaps he would have been mentioned as one.

Now, outside of the document, he might have been considered a terrorist, but not in the context of this post.

[PotatoHeadMick]

Dear Lord help us!

The term “terrorist” didn’t even exist until the nineteenth century and wasn’t in common parlance until the latter half of the twentieth, furthermore the document is in Latin so of course the English word “terrorist” is not used, that is why I suggest that the 13th Century term “bandit” with all its connotations would be roughly equivocal to the 21st century term “terrorist”; ie a politically loaded term used by pro-government media.

Try to keep up.